Skip to content
Zendesk and Front are two of the first names you’ll hear when people talk about customer support platforms. They’re both well-known, and both have loyal fans for good reasons.
Front feels like a supercharged shared inbox: collaborative, email-first, and ideal for smaller, relationship-driven teams.
Zendesk, on the other hand, is a full-scale ticketing system built for high-volume support, with deep automation, analytics, and a huge integrations marketplace.
There’s a lot to like about each, but their strengths—and limitations—show up quickly once you factor in your team’s size, channels, and workflows. This article is for you if you’re choosing between Front and Zendesk and want a clear, practical answer on which one fits better.
I’ll break down:
- Pricing and overall value for money
- Key features and capabilities
- Where each tool shines, and where it tends to fall short
Table of Contents
- How I Researched and Evaluated These Tools
- Front vs Zendesk: Quick Comparison
- Feature Comparison: Front vs Zendesk
- Pricing Comparison: Front vs Zendesk
- User Reviews for Front Vs Zendesk from G2
- Front vs Zendesk: What Should You Choose?
- What if neither Front nor Zendesk works for you?
- Final Verdict
- Frequently Asked Questions
How I Researched and Evaluated These Tools
I’ve been researching and writing about customer support software for years now. At Hiver, we’ve helped over 10,000 support teams move away from legacy help desks due to their complex nature. Many of them switched from Front or Zendesk because of pricing pressure, clunky interfaces, or slow support.
That firsthand experience shapes how I evaluate these platforms.
For this guide, I signed up for both platforms and tested them hands-on, explored product walkthroughs on YouTube, and dug through G2 reviews, Capterra feedback, and Reddit discussions to see where teams struggle and what they like. I also verified pricing directly from official sources and cross-checked vendor claims against real user feedback.
My goal here is simple: help you decide whether Front or Zendesk is a better fit for how your team works today.
Front vs Zendesk: Quick Comparison
Below is a side-by-side comparison of Font vs Zendesk, highlighting the key differences at a glance:
| Feature | Front | Zendesk |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Smaller, relationship-driven teams that live in email and need fast collaboration. | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ High-volume, process-driven teams that need structured ticketing, SLAs, and advanced routing. |
| Core Approach | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Shared inbox and collaborative conversations; no formal ticket numbers. | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Full ticketing system with case IDs and structured workflows. |
| Ease of Use | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Very easy for agents, email-like UI; lighter admin overhead. | ⭐⭐⭐ Steeper learning curve, especially for admins and complex setups. |
| Automation | ⭐⭐⭐ Simple rules for routing, tagging, and auto-replies; good for straightforward workflows. | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Advanced triggers, macros, time-based rules, and skills-based routing for complex flows. |
| Reporting | ⭐⭐⭐ Covers basics like volumes, SLAs, and response times; limited deep analysis. | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Robust analytics with Explore, custom dashboards, and granular SLA/reporting. |
| Integrations | ⭐⭐⭐ 100 integrations covering popular tools; smaller ecosystem. | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 1,600+ marketplace apps across CRM, e‑commerce, IT, analytics, and more. |
| CRM Integration | ⭐⭐⭐ Works well with Gmail and offers CRM via higher-tier integrations (e.g., Salesforce, HubSpot) on Scale. | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Deep, native integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, and others; rich sidebar context inside tickets. |
| Scalability | ⭐⭐⭐ Scales well up to mid-sized teams; can feel shallow for very complex ops. | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Built to scale large, multi-team, multi-channel support operations. |
| Setup Time | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Quick to get started; teams can be live in days with minimal configuration. | ⭐⭐⭐ Longer setup and configuration, especially for custom workflows and multiple channels. |
| Starting Price | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ From ~$25/seat/month, but most B2B teams need the $99 Scale plan for SLAs and CRM integrations. | ⭐⭐⭐ Zendesk Suite starts around $55/agent/month for core omnichannel support. |
| G2 Rating | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 4.7/5 (Front Customer Communication Platform). | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ 4.3/5 (Zendesk Support Suite). |
Feature Comparison: Front vs Zendesk
We’ve covered the big-picture differences. Now let’s get specific: how do these Front and Zendesk stack up on collaboration, automation, reporting, AI, and integrations?
Shared Inbox and Collaboration
Front centers everything on a shared inbox, so your team works from one queue instead of scattered mailboxes. Agents assign, tag, and move conversations through clear stages, which makes ownership and bottlenecks obvious.
Inside each thread, teammates discuss the issue with internal comments and refine answers through shared drafts, so the final reply is aligned and on-brand. Front also flags when someone is already replying, which cuts down on collisions and messy duplicate responses.
Zendesk is built around tickets, and agents manage everything from a unified interface called the Agent Workspace. Each customer issue becomes a ticket that’s assigned to a single agent, with a clear history of updates and actions taken over time.
Collaboration happens mainly through internal notes on tickets. Agents use them to share context, leave instructions, or flag issues for managers. Zendesk supports structured escalation and approval flows so managers can control who can change statuses, apply certain actions, or handle sensitive request types.
Verdict: Front offers a more collaborative, “everyone around the same inbox” experience, while Zendesk works better when clear ownership, audit trails, and structured escalation matter more than real-time teamwork.
One user on Reddit explains this difference perfectly,
With Zendesk, it’s more about leaving notes on tickets, and Front has a “chat-like” approach (think like Teams or Slack) that feels more real-time; you can share drafts, and because it looks like Gmail, it’s easier to get “casual” users to use it.
Omnichannel Support
Front handles email, live chat, SMS, phone, and social media from a single interface. The experience centers around email-style conversations. The starter plan limits you to one channel type.
Zendesk is built for omnichannel support at scale. The same Agent Workspace brings email, chat, phone, social media, and messaging apps into a single screen. Agents handle all channels from one interface without switching tabs. A context panel on the right surfaces customer details, interaction history, and relevant help articles alongside the conversation. Routing, reporting, and workflows stay consistent across every channel. Suite plans include multi-channel from the start.
Verdict: Zendesk provides stronger omnichannel support than Front. If you’re managing phone, chat, and social alongside email at volume, Zendesk handles it better.
Automation and Workflows
Front focuses on simple, rule-based automation. You can auto-assign conversations by keyword or channel, tag them by domain or customer type, and route messages to specific teammates or inboxes. A visual rules builder makes this easy for non-technical admins.
Beyond basic routing, Front supports workload balancing by distributing messages based on each teammate’s capacity, so no one gets overwhelmed. Smart rules use dynamic variables that pull live data from your CRM or other connected systems, so automations stay accurate without manual upkeep.
Zendesk goes much deeper into process automation. Triggers, automations, and macros let you build multi-step workflows that react to events or time. You can escalate tickets before SLAs breach, prioritize VIP customers, or reassign work based on agent load or skills. Conditions like channel, tags, or customer attributes make routing very granular.
Verdict: Front covers the basics and keeps automation simple. Zendesk is better if you need complex, conditional workflows and multi-team routing.
Reporting and Analytics
Front’s reporting focuses on day-to-day performance. You can track response and resolution times, SLAs, workload across teammates, and CSAT.
This makes it easy to spot backlogs, see who’s overloaded, and keep an eye on basic support health without much setup. Reports can be scheduled to run automatically, and you can export data if you want to analyze it. For smaller or mid-sized teams, this usually covers the essentials, but you’re mostly limited to predefined metrics and views.
Zendesk’s reporting is built for teams that lean heavily on data. With Zendesk Explore, you get detailed dashboards for ticket volume, response and resolution times, SLAs, agent performance, and customer satisfaction across all channels. On higher plans, you can define custom metrics, slice data by channel, group, time, or region, and track trends over longer periods.
Verdict: Zendesk has more powerful reporting and analytics than Front. Data-driven support leaders who need custom KPIs, long-term trend analysis, or polished reports for leadership will likely find Front’s analytics too limited.
AI Capabilities
Front’s AI suite has four main pieces. Copilot suggests replies based on past conversations and help center content, so agents respond faster while staying on-brand. Topics auto-categorize conversations and highlight where automation can help. Smart QA scores every interaction against your quality rubric, turning QA into ongoing coaching instead of a monthly audit.
Smart CSAT predicts satisfaction scores without sending surveys by looking at sentiment, effort, and resolution. Front also offers AI Answers, which can fully resolve common questions at $0.70 per automated resolution.
Zendesk splits AI into built-in features and an advanced add-on. Core AI includes bots that answer common questions, auto-fill ticket fields, and surface help articles. The Advanced AI add-on adds Copilot and Intelligent Triage.
Copilot summarizes long tickets, drafts replies, and suggests macros or steps from internal guides while agents work. Intelligent Triage detects intent, language, and sentiment, then uses those signals to route, prioritize, and trigger workflows. Zendesk prices Copilot per agent per month, and AI resolutions on a per-resolution model, which can get expensive at scale.
Verdict: Both Front and Zendesk offer mature AI capabilities, but they apply them differently. Front’s AI is built to support agents directly, with tools like AI Copilot, Smart QA, and Smart CSAT helping teams write better replies, maintain quality, and monitor customer sentiment. Zendesk’s AI is geared more toward automation and scale, with AI embedded across bots, routing, and analytics, and advanced capabilities available through add-ons.
Hiver’s free AI Summarizer helps support teams quickly summarize long customer conversations by pasting content or uploading files. You can adjust the summary length to get just the context you need.
Try the free AI Summarizer.
Integrations
Front integrates with ~100 applications, including Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, and common CRM tools. The API allows custom integrations, but the ecosystem is smaller than Zendesk’s.
Zendesk’s marketplace is one of its strongest differentiators, with over 1,600 pre-built integrations. They span over 15 categories: CRM, e-commerce, analytics, project management, IT, HR, and more. Native connectors exist for Salesforce, Shopify, Magento, Jira, HubSpot, Slack, and most major business tools. This means agents can pull order history, CRM records, or project tickets directly into the Zendesk sidebar without switching tabs.
Verdict: Zendesk offers a larger and more mature integration ecosystem than Front. Organizations with complex tech stacks or industry-specific tools will likely find better native support in Zendesk’s marketplace.
Pricing Comparison: Front vs Zendesk
Both platforms start around $19-25 per user, but the similarities end there. Here’s what you’re actually paying for and where costs balloon.
Front Pricing
Front’s pricing is straightforward. It has three tiers with clear seat limits.
Plans:
- Starter: $25/seat/month (up to 10 seats) — single channel, basic automation
- Professional: $65/seat/month (up to 50 seats) — multi-channel, analytics, integrations
- Enterprise: $105/seat/month (unlimited seats) — SSO, advanced security, dedicated support
- Add-Ons: AI Answers ($0.70/resolution) – Premium channels ($100/mo) – Onboarding fees for contracts over $25K
- Free Trial: 14 days, no credit card required
Zendesk Pricing
Zendesk’s pricing is split into two product lines: Support (ticketing only) and Suite (ticketing + chat/voice/social).
Plans:
- Support Team: $19/agent/month — basic ticketing, email only
- Suite Team: $55/agent/month — ticketing + email/chat/voice/social, knowledge base, bots
- Suite Professional: $115/agent/month — skills-based routing, HIPAA, advanced analytics
- Suite Enterprise: Custom pricing — sandbox, custom roles, data protection
- Add-Ons: Advanced AI ($50/agent/mo) – Workforce Management ($25/agent/mo) – Quality Assurance ($35/agent/mo) – Contact Center ($50/agent/mo)
- Free Trial: 14 days. Startups may qualify for 6 months free.
Here’s my honest opinion about how Front vs Zendesk pricing
Front’s $25/seat plan looks attractive at first. But once you grow beyond 10 agents or need a second channel, you have to move to $65/seat, which is a 160% jump.
Zendesk Suite starts at $55/agent with multi-channel baked in, which beats Front’s Professional if email isn’t your only support channel. But add-ons kill budgets: a 20-person team adding Advanced AI, Workforce Management, and Quality Assurance spends an extra $26,400 annually on top of base pricing.
It’s also important to highlight that Zendesk implementations often require professional services (budget $5K-$15 for complex workflows). On the other hand, Front deploys faster, but customization options are limited unless you’re on Enterprise.
User Reviews for Front Vs Zendesk from G2
We’ve covered pricing and features. Now let’s look at how these tools actually perform in day-to-day use. I aggregated feedback from G2, Capterra, Reddit, and other software marketplaces to see what teams really think about Front and Zendesk.
What Users Say About Front
Front scores high on usability and cross-team collaboration. Users praise how well it fits into existing workflows. One Reddit user says,
“Front integrates well with GSuite and Slack, making it a favorite for ‘non‑tech’ teams (Sales, Operations, Admin) who want to collaborate seamlessly with the CS team.”
But the experience isn’t perfect. Another G2 user flags,
“Some automation feels limited for very complex workflows. The reporting is good for daily operations, but advanced analytics sometimes feel basic compared to dedicated support analytics tools.”
What Users Say About Zendesk
Users who need deep ticketing and CRM capabilities tend to swear by Zendesk. One Reddit reviewer puts it this way:
“If you want a system with persistent ticket tracking and meaningful data, ZD is much stronger. It does feel like it has a steep learning curve when you get to the various rules and automations it is capable of, but even right out of the box, it is a strong ticketing system. And the CRM integration tends to be fantastic. Also, ZD has integrations with many CRMs, such that you can bring in a lot of account information directly into the ZD sidebar to view while working on a ticket – including a link to the full CRM record for the person or company.”
But that power comes with trade‑offs, especially around cost, complexity, and the day-to-day experience for agents.
One user on G2 explains this in detail,
“It can become expensive as the team grows. Adding agents and advanced features can quickly increase costs, which can be hard for startups or smaller teams. Another downside is that the configuration can get complex. Triggers, automations, views, and workflows are powerful, but over time, they become difficult to manage if not documented well. The UI, while functional, can feel heavy and slow when handling a large number of tickets. It’s not always the fastest experience for agents.”
G2 ratings tell the same story. Even though Zendesk seems to be having more reviews, Front outscores Zendesk across every category, especially Ease of Use (9.1 vs 8.6) and Quality of Support (9.1 vs 8.4).
| Criteria | Front | Zendesk |
|---|---|---|
| Meets Requirements | 9.1 (1,900 reviews) | 8.6 (5,147 reviews) |
| Ease of Use | 9.1 (1,916 reviews) | 8.6 (5,191 reviews) |
| Ease of Setup | 8.8 (698 reviews) | 8.0 (3,212 reviews) |
| Ease of Admin | 8.9 (473 reviews) | 8.2 (3,086 reviews) |
| Quality of Support | 9.1 (1,635 reviews) | 8.4 (4,825 reviews) |
| Good Business Partner | 9.2 (459 reviews) | 8.4 (3,011 reviews) |
| Product Direction (% positive) | 9.3 (1,788 reviews) | 8.0 (4,800 reviews) |
Front vs Zendesk: What Should You Choose?
We’ve compared the features, pricing, and real user feedback. Now, let’s cut to the chase: which platform actually fits your team?
Choose Front if:
- You’re a small-to-medium team (under 50 agents) prioritizing speed and collaboration
- You want support to feel like email, not a ticketing system
- Multiple teammates need to jump into the same conversation without rigid handoffs
- Ease of use and fast onboarding matter more than deep automation
Choose Zendesk if:
- You’re managing high ticket volumes (500+ daily) across multiple channels
- You need advanced automation, skills-based routing, and strict SLA tracking
- Data-driven reporting and custom analytics are critical for your operations
- You’re planning to scale to 100+ agents with complex workflows
What if neither Front nor Zendesk works for you?
Front feels lightweight but lacks depth at scale. Zendesk is powerful but heavy, complex, and priced like an enterprise platform. If neither feels right, there’s a third option worth looking at.
Hiver is an AI-powered customer service platform built for modern, fast-moving teams. It gives you the collaborative feel of a shared inbox with the structured features of a helpdesk—without the admin overhead or the “ticket number” experience.
Hiver’s interface is clean and intuitive. All customer interactions across email, live chat, WhatsApp, voice, and social media are managed from a single left-side panel. You can see the status of every query, track open, pending, and resolved conversations at a glance, and get started in minutes, not weeks.
Some of the key features Hiver offers:
- Omnichannel support: Manage customer conversations across email, live chat, SMS, WhatsApp, voice, and social media from one place. Your team can see every interaction in a single view and switch channels without losing context.
- Team collaboration: Use internal notes and @mentions to discuss cases right inside the conversation.
- AI Copilot: AI Copilot suggests contextual answers, drafts replies, fine-tunes tone, and rephrases messages.
- AI Agents: AI Agents autonomously categorize, tag, and route conversations, detect urgency and sentiment, auto-close thank-you replies, resolve FAQs, and trigger multi-step workflows.
- AI Insights: Spot resolution bottlenecks, forecast potential issues, and surface account health risks before they escalate.
- Automation: Build simple if-then rules to route, tag, prioritize, and auto-assign conversations based on keywords, skill, and availability.
- Custom reports & dashboards: Track resolution time, agent workload, and CSAT, or build your own metrics view.
- Customer feedback (CSAT): Send customizable surveys post-resolution or at any point in the customer journey.
- Knowledge base: Create and share help articles to improve self-service rates and reduce incoming tickets.
- Free plan: Hiver offers a free plan with unlimited users.
- 24/7 support: Email and live chat support from real humans on every plan, including the free one.
Hiver’s pricing is straightforward. What you see is what you get. There’s a free plan with unlimited users. Paid plans are priced as follows:
- Growth: $25/user/month
- Pro: $65/user/month
- Elite: $105/user/month
If you want to check out Hiver
Final Verdict
Front and Zendesk aren’t competitors in the traditional sense; they’re just built for different teams. Front prioritizes collaboration and simplicity, making support feel like a shared email rather than a ticketing system. Zendesk prioritizes structure and scale, providing the automation and analytics needed to manage high volumes and complex workflows.
Both platforms have trade-offs. Front struggles with reporting as you scale. Zendesk can feel heavy and outdated for smaller teams.
If neither Front nor Zendesk feels like the right fit, Hiver sits in the middle. It combines the collaboration teams like in Front with the structure and visibility you’d expect from a helpdesk, without the setup overhead that comes with Zendesk. AI is built into the product to assist with triage, replies, and insights, instead of being locked behind separate add-ons.
Try Hiver today and check for yourself.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Which scales better for high-ticket-volume teams?
Zendesk scales better for high-ticket-volume teams than Front. Its ticket-based system, advanced routing, and SLA enforcement are designed for thousands of conversations. Front works well up to around 50 agents, but becomes harder to manage at higher volumes.
2. How do pricing plans compare for similar agent counts?
Front and Zendesk start at similar price points, but costs diverge as teams scale. Front’s lower tiers look affordable, but key features are locked behind higher plans. Zendesk includes more core functionality upfront, though add-ons for AI, workforce management, and QA can quickly increase total cost.
3. Which integrates best with Salesforce and CRMs?
Zendesk integrates better with Salesforce and enterprise CRMs. Its marketplace offers native integrations that surface account data directly inside tickets. Front also supports CRM integrations, but only on higher-tier plans, which limits access for growing teams.
4. How do automation and SLA features differ?
Zendesk offers more advanced automation and SLA controls than Front. It supports multi-step workflows, time-based triggers, skills-based routing, and SLA escalations. Front’s automation is easier to set up but limited to basic rules like assignment and tagging.
5. Which has stronger reporting and analytics capabilities?
Zendesk has stronger reporting and analytics than Front. Zendesk provides customizable dashboards, historical trend analysis, and detailed SLA reporting. Front’s analytics cover core metrics like response time and workload, but lack the depth and customization.
